WA: Seattle set to prevent landlords from considering applicants’ criminal records

[The Seattle Times]

Seattle set to prevent landlords from considering applicants’ criminal records. Seattle landlords would be almost completely prohibited from screening prospective tenants based on their criminal histories, under a proposed ordinance approved by a City Council committee Tuesday.

The only people who could be denied housing based on their criminal histories would be those listed on sex-offender registries because of adult convictions.

And landlords denying housing to such sex offenders would still need to state a legitimate business reason for doing so.

Read more

 

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Not to worry. The landlords will figure out a way around the law. Haven’t they done that in California by using everything other than the sex offender registry to deny registrants?

While it has good intentions, it still isn’t enough. The problem is they concentrate on sexual crimes, but totally ignore all of the other acts of violence directed towards kids AND adults. Gang members, wife/kid beaters ok, sexual crimes, not so much.

The problem is that the registry isn’t considered punishment and is also considered public record. Being on the registry itself isn’t a “criminal record” and likely legally excluded from being covered under the proposed law.

This is discrimination, and if there’s no reason to exclude registrants from renting and getting a place to live. The reason why they won’t want to allow registrants to rent is because of these notifications being in the hands of weak minded individuals and they’ll squeal around to the public about a tenant being RSO that’s going to do something real bad and create hysteria, to humiliate and harass a registrant.

“The only people who could be denied housing based on their criminal histories would be those listed on sex-offender registries because of adult convictions.”
Of course, exclude the group with the lowest re-offense rate. No one will complain about that, will they?

Hmm….. If you run a criminal background check on me it comes back clean…. 20 years ago was my last criminal offence….. But the registry isn’t punitive it’s civil…. So how does a civil notification get one denied housing…. It’s that wink wink BS…. It’s civil (Wink wink) not punitive. The last background check I had done on me was when I got my last job…. Nothing came back on the criminal background but a short sentence saying potential match on the registry…. Tell me why that comes up in a background check…… Because it’s flipping punitive that’s why!

There are say 400+ something comments from landlords saying what a bad idea this is, and not for the reasons we like. Does anyone feel like commenting there? I am for some reason having a hard time thinking of something to say.